Home / Benandanti Archive / Source, Claim and Interpretation
Archive methods

Source, Claim and Interpretation

The foundation of a reliable historical website is a distinction between what a source says, what it supports, and what readers infer.

2026-10-28·Archive methods·source-vs-claim
Historical method: a recorded belief or accusation is not independent proof of the supernatural event described.

Three layers

An entry in a trial record may say a witness described nocturnal travel. That supports the claim that the record contains such testimony. A historian may infer an underlying communal belief. An imaginative retelling may portray a literal journey. Those are three separate layers.

The citation trap

A source citation can be authentic and still be a poor match for a particular sentence. Citations must be checked at the claim level, with uncertainty preserved rather than cosmetically removed.

Public correction policy

Each page has a stable identifier and review date. Readers can report a specific disputed sentence and supporting source, and future revisions can be compared in a Git repository.

Source and revision record

  1. Trial transcripts: Paolo Gasparutto and Battista Moduco, 1575–1581 (translated excerpt via University of Washington)Edited translation of primary record · A modern publication of translated trial testimony, not a facsimile of the original manuscript. Copyright may apply.
  2. Carlo Ginzburg, The Night Battles (updated edition, 2026)Publisher listing · Publisher bibliographic and interpretive overview; updated edition dated September 8, 2026.

Published in this site build: 2026-10-28. · Editorial and correction policy