Home / Benandanti Archive / How the Inquisition Classified the Accounts
Trials & testimony

How the Inquisition Classified the Accounts

Officials approached unfamiliar nocturnal claims with institutional categories that could differ sharply from local self-description.

2026-10-28·Trials & testimony·inquisitorial-categories
Historical method: a recorded belief or accusation is not independent proof of the supernatural event described.

Classification has consequences

For a person who described themselves as acting against harmful witches, being classified as a witch was not a minor terminological change. Institutional concepts affected questioning, suspicion and the possible meaning of subsequent statements.

The feedback loop

A leading question can influence the answers it receives, and a recorded answer can then reinforce the assumptions that produced the question. This does not prove that every accused person adopted the official narrative. It describes a mechanism to investigate case by case.

What researchers should compare

Read the sequence of questions and answers, when available. Distinguish the witness’s vocabulary from the inquisitor’s and ask whether the later case contains evidence of continued local beneficial status.

Source and revision record

  1. Imagining the Witches’ Sabbath (Cambridge University Press)Scholarly book · Modern scholarly treatment of the interpretive construction of the sabbath.
  2. Carlo Ginzburg, The Night Battles (updated edition, 2026)Publisher listing · Publisher bibliographic and interpretive overview; updated edition dated September 8, 2026.
  3. Franco Nardon (ed.), Benandanti e inquisitori nel Friuli del Seicento (1999)University repository · University of Trieste volume focused on seventeenth-century healing and counter-witchcraft.

Published in this site build: 2026-10-28. · Editorial and correction policy