Home / Benandanti Archive / What the Archive Cannot Tell Us
Source criticism

What the Archive Cannot Tell Us

Gaps, silence and survival bias are facts about the available record, not invitations to invent what a witness must have meant.

2026-10-28·Source criticism·historical-silences
Historical method: a recorded belief or accusation is not independent proof of the supernatural event described.

Survival is selective

Most daily activities were never transcribed by church courts. Of the records that existed, only some survived and became available to later scholars. A story seen through an inquisition is not an unbiased census of local beliefs.

Absence is not a verdict

When a later deposition omits a motif, this may reflect changed belief, different questioning, selective recording or the witness’s circumstances. The omission alone usually cannot distinguish these possibilities.

Honest display

The archive marks what it cannot establish: exact claimed gathering locations, uniform doctrine, a continuous lineage and supernatural outcomes. Stated uncertainty allows future research to move forward instead of merely repeating attractive assertions.

Source and revision record

  1. Carlo Ginzburg, The Night Battles (2013 edition)Publisher listing · Accessible edition record with table of contents.
  2. Franco Nardon (ed.), Benandanti e inquisitori nel Friuli del Seicento (1999)University repository · University of Trieste volume focused on seventeenth-century healing and counter-witchcraft.

Published in this site build: 2026-10-28. · Editorial and correction policy